-->

Pages

The World Turned Upside Down

This from the NYTimes: "Like many of his mayoral colleagues nationwide, Mr. Reed [Mayor of Atlanta] openly expressed frustration with the [Occupy] protesters’ methods."
Quoting Mayor Reed - “The attitude I have seen here is not consistent with any civil rights protests I have seen in Atlanta and certainly not consistent with the most respected forms of civil disobedience.”
Only in the distorted world of American politics could an African American politician criticize protestors with a convoluted phrase like - "the most respected forms of civil disobedience."
What exactly is the mayor referring to? Does he expect Martin Luther King in a suit and tie to lead every Occupy march? Or perhaps it's the lack of sanitary facilities at the encampments. We could solve that problem with dual public bathrooms, you know protester and non-protester or the 99% and the 1%. I wonder if the mayor would have any issues with those separate but equal facilities.
What we have here is yet another co-opted politician sucking at the corporate teat and seeking to justify his actions by invoking some set of rules about appropriate protesting. Did I miss that lesson in my high school Civics class? The Approved Rules of Protest 101.
What I didn't miss was the facts on the ground that any politician can be bought and paid for. Welcome to the Club Mayor Reed, you know it used to be an all white club, now it's simply all wealthy and their well paid lackeys. Why not bring out the fire hoses and the dogs. Is Bull Connor still alive?



Today's History Lessons



*Between the hours of 8AM and 10PM, at low volume, when convenient for those in power. Other restrictions may apply. The terms of this offer are subject to change at any time. Failure to comply with new terms, whether or not notice has been given, may result in penalties, including by not limited to: fines, confiscation of personal property, physical restraint, imprisonment, injury and death.
--
Franklin photo credit: Belasfotos (thanks Sandy)

Los Angeles Supports Occupy


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the adoption of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby stands in SUPPORT for the continuation of the peaceful and vibrant exercise in First Amendment Rights carried out by "Occupy Los Angeles"

Read the entire text of the resolution from the Los Angeles City Council here.

Coordinated Attack on Occupy


They orders have been sent down from the top: "Stop these Occupy people now!"

How else do you explain the recent escalations from formerly liberal mayors and their police forces? Tear gas and flash grenades in Oakland. Overwhelming force in Atlanta. Extreme violence in Melbourne. New eviction notices in San Francisco. Raids always midnight to 4 a.m. Reporters being cordoned off from the intense action and then, in the case of Oakland, tear gassed in their roped off media safe zone.

Don't think that it's just the police and government officials. The mainstream media is complicit as well. Take the Washington Post, you know the newspaper that broke the Watergate story that brought down Richard Nixon. Take a look at how they covered the Police attack in Oakland.

Orders from the top: Discredit and disband the Occupy camps before they get any more traction.

So, what are you doing to support these people? Have called city hall? Written an email to the mayor, the governor, the president. Let them know you do not live in a police state. We are so quick to condemn the actions of dictators in Egypt, Libya and throughout the world, but we tolerate in silence the same actions in our own cities.

You can do something or you can remain silent while local uniforms beholded to the top corporations enforce the law and order they need to maintain their control of this country and it's wealth.

Your choice. Doing nothing is the same as choosing the side of the oppressors.

Thought for the Day (10/26/11)


"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy

Police Escalation in Bay Area

There has been a clear escalation of the tension between local governments and the various Occupy encampments in the San Francisco Bay Area. Last night OccupyOakland was hit with a highly coordinated police raid, including tear gas and "non-lethal projectiles."

All three photographs in today's post are the result of such 'non-lethal' action by law enforcement.

What local politicians and law enforcement don't seem to understand is that they are not simply attacking a couple of hundred kids in tents. They are going after the ever growing number of supporters the Occupy Movement has behind it. Every act of violence from the police grows the anger, the frustration and the numbers of Occupy supporters.

And yes, government sanctioned violence will lead to a violent response. There is simply no way to control all of people in the streets. Violence radicalizes those who sought only to peacefully protest the obscene government complicit greed that is destroying our society.

These are easily learned lessons from history. These are easily learned lessons from the Arab Spring of this year. But once again the government cares more about the rules of running a city park, then the cries of the people they are supposed to serve. This is going to end well but in the process a lot more people are going to get hurt. Wake Up and smell the tear gas Mr. Mayor. Step in now Governor Brown. How about some action to back up all those pretty words Mr. President.

How Can We Have a Leaderless Revolution?

The mainstream media continues to ask: 

"What is Occupy Wall Street about?"
"What do they want?" 
"Where are their demands?"
"Who are their leaders; who do we interview?"

We should expect those questions from people who are hearing about OWS for the first time. But the media is (or was) about journalism, going after a story, doing some research and easiest of all - reading other media coverage of a potential story.

Unfortunately what passes for mainstream media today is infotainment and not journalism. Which is why we are still getting "What is OWS about?" questions from even some previously responsible sources. Caitlin Dewey writing for Kiplinger recently asked the wrong questions in this article. Her lead read: "I went to the Occupy D.C. protests hoping to find a movement. Instead, I found people to disorganized and idealistic to actually change the things they they criticized."

Really Caitlin you went to find a movement and couldn't locate it standing right in it's midst? Methinks the problem is not with Occupy but with your sight or rather lack of insight.

If you are a journalist or just someone who wants to know what's going on with Occupy, try this article from Daily Kos. You might be the gist from their lead: "If you are a political pundit and you still don't know what Occupy Wall Street stands for, you are an idiot."

This really and truly is not rocket science, in fact, it takes a profound effort not to understand what is going on in Zuccotti Park and in cities throughout the country. Pay attention - these people are trying to take the country back for all of us.

The 'Leaders' we need to worry about are not those who will emerge from Occupy but those that already hold the strings on Wall Street and in Washington. Leadership removal is much more critical than leadership replacement.